3200-10,000 (I find this to be really handy for indoor family photos, which is essentially the only time I need high ISOs) the larger and brighter viewfinder the size (yes, one can really feel a difference) overall operational responsiveness to a much lesser degree: fewer buttons on the back of the camera, smaller red dot, more matte black finish. I find the M262 colours different enough from the M-P I just sold - to my eye the blues, reds, aquas and purples feel denser. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. Really thats been the beauty of the Leica M262 for me for the most part, its done almost exactly what Ive needed it to. These were live-view using the screen on the back or a slot in electronic viewfinder and video. A M262 is a friendly camera. Leica M Typ 240. The SET and the ISO buttons are much more useful though to be honest, I personally dont even use the stuff in the set menu either. The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. I will stick with my film Leica for now. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. Upload or insert images from URL. great output, but cant get a shot off faster than with the M8. The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. The controls are easy to change while the camera is at your eye. The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). 20% better video recording quality (main camera), Has continuous autofocus when recording movies, has continuous autofocus when recording movies. The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M8 A Year with an Ageing Digital Rangefinder By Rui Hu, Panasonic GM1 Review: A Digital ILC Alternative to the Olympus XA2? From what I gather, skin tones have better rendering with the M10. One of the advantages of live-view is the same as one of the advantages of rangefinder cameras they both allow you to observe the world outside of the frame. Id prefer to do this with the Leica as its the camera I use most often and so the battery is always charged with space on a memory card. So the M262 is going to stay, and the Leica M240 go. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. Weight is certainly a thing though! In one of his editorial pieces in Amateur Photographer he applauds this philosophy. No more out of focus shots. The focus motor moves the lens in order to autofocus. Unsurprisingly, the camera never really made a breakthrough in the video world so perhaps Leica decided it wasn't worth keeping it. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come. Its marquee features are omissions rather than additions: the M-D doesn't . The even newer M-P Typ 240 purchase just opens up addtional opportunities of using a digital M as a multi-purpose tool. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_12',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); As it turned out, I would find more advantages with the Leica M262 when I got it. . dslr . I have used many rangefinders, a Leica M8, M9 (and its variants M-E/M9P/MM), M262, M240P and of course most recently the M-D 262. We think it rises to the challenge. In fact, I pressed the LV (for live-view) button on the camera before I even took a photo. Weight savings from the M10 may be there, but with a Thumbs Up in the hot shoe, the M240 feels good and substantial in the hand.ISO setting. Epson RD1 style I loved my RD1! Sadly, that is the way of digital cameras my friend, a never-ending hamster wheel of upgrades. I have a X113 and an M262. In fact, for this very reason the Leica M262 has actually presented me with the least inspiration so far. You and Roger Hicks. This might be the better screen, or it might be residual live-view-denial telling me that the more simple M262 is a better camera for me. Using the zoom focus button on the front of the camera along with Live View is a good aid to focus in these situations.Ergonomics. Didnt have the budget to stretch to a Summilux/Summicron/ Summarit. Thanks. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Overall, these changes made the move from the M9 to M262 feel greater than the sum of their parts. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. The entire camera feels built to last and like a well engineered tool in use. Anyone have both that could provide a side by side? The last four images you posted are the best images Ive seen from an M240. Image quality is exceptionally good across the native ISO range, the weight has been decreased substantially, and . In short, getting two cameras- a classic and a modern type, solves the damnable inadequacy issue that arises in all of us when you own just one type. Reduction of features is something no other brand of cameras shouts about, ever. I got the m262 because it has everything i need and nothing i do not need. I didnt really need the better low light performance that the M262 offered, and was quite happy with the speed and output from the often lauded CCD sensor in the M9. Compared to the M9 Ive found less of a problem with magenta shift, especially in skin tones, though its fair to say the bias is still toward magenta as opposed the the green bias I found in my Sonys especially the older and cheapest ones that had frankly horrible colour-science. Having live-view is great and the screen is an improvement but its too big for an M and the files look/feel like something that came out of a Sony. Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. The battery can be recharged and used over again. I dont mind adjusting contrast, thats just part of the process of me. Flip-out screens can be useful for tricky shots. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. Mostly because I wanted to shoot below 0.7m and Id have to use Live View for that. https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. The overall user interface of the Leica M262 turned out to be a bigger upgrade than I expected too though its still not been quite the perfect experience. If you like aluminium choose the M262, if you prefer brass go for the M240. "MM-P""" Leica M Typ240MM-P Typ240 I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. Can you compare side by side, please? I keep looking at the 262 as a hidden gem. So its not a financial burden to have it around, and selling it wont yield me that much cash, and I have no desire to sell it anyways since its my favorite M of all time that still serves some legitimate purpose. It has two memory card slots, allowing you to store more photos without switching cards. And sometimes they could come in handy. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. As mentioned, one of the big selling points Leica hung their marketing angle off when launching the Leica M262 was the reduction of menu options to 2 screens compared to the M240. Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6. Another M10 fetish. All features aside, my lust was triggered by the drastic reduction in size. The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. Your link has been automatically embedded. . Thank you for it. Im used to focus peaking from shooting video with the Sony cameras, so it was such a short leap to press the LV button and take photos in a way that felt familiar. I use the 1.4 magnifier with my old 90mm tele-elmarit and an external viewfinder with my voigtlander 21mm f1.4 both work just fine for me. The Leica M-D Typ 262 was released in 2016 and is already rather difficult to find. The WB white balance button is completely redundant by my measure. (they really have me suckered in dont they?!). True Leica again (after the M240), pure and sololy focused on the Photography essentials. In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. It happened with the M8,M9, more recently the M240 and now the M262. Aluminium body makes is nice and light. The image on the back screen of the Leica M240 is very cool toned and unsaturated. Im an auto-ISO guy so the dial is nice for the little I use it. I'm not sure if it's ok to show a snapshot of the LFI article. Privacy policy. BTW the battery life of a charge is awesome. I really enjoyed the m60 when I shot it a few years back, but for practical day-to-day photography, I think a screen suits my digital shooting desires better.And besides, the little flip out thumb-rest?! A few more differences - Leica M10 vs Leica M240. - and the M240 in color. First you have to press the ISO button, then use the thumb dial to scroll to the ISO you want, then finally either press SET or the INFO button to lock it in. Water-resistant devices can resist the penetration of water, such as powerful water jets, but not being submerged into water. As I talk about in my M9 review, the screen on that camera really is very crap, so this did feel like a big enough deal to make the jump. At which point I bought a stand-in M240 and I discovered the joys of live view on an m-mount Leica. Also for helping critical focus wide open at close distance. The view taken by some Leica users when the M240 was released was that features like live-view and video had no place on a Leica. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Though I prefer using Rolleiflex and an old M4 for my creative projects. Using the right SD card is key here. I need a new 50mm lens. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M rangefinder, and the first to use a CMOS type sensor. Be the first. This happens with the M240 from time to time. Usability is great (with some of the limitations you mentioned), and image quality of the 262 is certainly superb, and the main reason (aside from usability and a good sensor), at least for me, the Leica M glass, is a topic somebody else can cover much better than I can. Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. The M240 is a camera where perhaps 50% of the image is created in camera, 50% in computer. All the added features that the M240 brought to the table didnt really appeal to me, and specifically because I didnt think I was interested in live view, I felt that all the M10 could offer me was an ISO dial. This has become a bit of a trend now, I buy a digital Leica, shoot with it for a while, decide to sell it for one reason or another, and then scramble to write about it in the final few days of owning it. With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. !if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_13',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); One way or another, in the time Ive been using the camera, Ive not got used to this little issue, though I have at least learned to live with it. The price is$5195/4050. I just dont shoot it at that high ISO for it to be a problem, and often wonder what on earth people are doing with their cameras to need the sorts of high ISOs that get spoken about it reviews. Now, I should just say at this point that when I first got my Leica M262 I found the exact opposite. I upgraded to the M240 from an M9, had it for 3 months and went back to an M9. Its been that camera that I know is there and just crack out when it feels right. The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. I use it for mostly personal/travel type shooting, with the occasional casual paid shoot. It does make me wonder if they could have slimmed down this body like the M10, were they to have released this camera as a major upgrade rather than a stripped-back sidestep from the M240. Compared Usage Recommendations More. Battery power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. He mentioned that he drives older vehicles in order to be able to afford just the kit he wants.Agreed with John Smith. Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. For me, digital cant create that Portra look, or black and whiteand I really really tried to like the digital Ms, I guess thats where I am different I really enjoy the digital cameras, [] my heart. To make pictures, those are good bodies to be used with good lens. The body is pretty well weather sealed. Its. I hadnt noticed that it focused closer though. . When the Leica M262 was released, Leica proudly told the world that the menu had been reduced to two screens worth of features. This never really bothered me about the M9, but having the issue taken away made me appreciate the issue for what it was. Ive decided to sell my Leica M typ 262, so I thought it about time I write a bit of a post about it. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. but it really did sound like something was missing inside compared to the 240. - 35mmc, https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party, Nikon 28ti and 35ti - Mini-Review - By Ahmed Al Shorouqi, 5 frames with the Nikon FM2 & Agfa APX 400 in my Paris - By Martina Rigotti, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. Display as a link instead, It is certainly one of the most economical full frame digital Leica M cameras out there, however, still a very expensive camera, even used. Ill have to dig out an online manual , I got an 262 you have to press SET after choosing- only with 3 button possiblewith latest software (2021). This friendly dig on Facebook from Alex Hakimi somewhat sums up how ridiculous all this really is: if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); Anyway, the point is, at one stage, not all that long ago, I was very happy with the M262 and didnt really feel like the M10 could possibly bring any advantages to me. I appreciate your thoughts on the 262 v the 240 as I am thinking about setting an MD body. In case you're confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. A week or so later I was on a shoot for work. I upgrade cameras, selling them and adding a little bit of funds from what disposable income I do have, also relying on credit a bit too much. Source: DxOMark. In the real world, I was making the M9 work for me in terms of low light shooting, as such, I have literally never found a single issue with high ISO noise from the M262. The shutter and cocking mechanism are much quieter than in the earlier and higher-priced M Typ 240, and allow two frames per second to be recorded in single shot mode. I love the M240, didn't feel to switch to the M10. For me and my tastes though, the Leica M262 does feel like an advancement from the M240. I have both and haven't noticed any difference but I haven't done a side by side comparison. Great review as always, I look forward to the M10 review I think the slimmer body size alone is a reason to upgrade, feel like a proper M body. Funny thing that while the M10 launched, I ordered one early 2017 thinking this may be the M I waited for. The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken. Live-view with any lens I liked was fun. I cant keep it my business partner has vetoed that idea. I shoot with 35mm and 50mm lenses. Help us by suggesting a value. In my view the lens in use IS much more important than a bit colour differences M240/M262/other Ms. The fact that Ive somehow managed to rationalise my way out of that opinion doesnt change how good the M262 really is, and indeed how well suited to me I once felt it to be. Any chance youre planning to do a write up on that Nokton 50mm f/1.2? The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. It tells you : take your time, have fun with the manual focus, enjoy the concepts small is beautiful and less is more, listen to the music made by the shutter, look how discret you are when shooting and readily agreed, leave the arm race to the geek and feel free to take pictures your way.Shooting with the M262 is as simple and as pleasant as a walk in the forest in summer. . BECOME A MEMBER to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMbqwh98qO5wWowtQjIK8ig/joinEXCLUSIVE PRESETS FOR IMAGES CAPTURED WITH LEICA CAMERAS:. Help us by suggesting a value. A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. My M8 is still around for those who are wondering. Hmm I wonder if you might be right there. As such, it felt like itd be the perfect camera for me. To seethedifference between Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 cameras we have put together Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 specs comparison tablebelow. Yes, it adds a Wi-Fi connectivity, which is something completely new in my workflow, but the overall experience is so much simpler. Controls feel well balanced and satisfyingly precise. The Leica M262 feels to me like almost everything anyone could or should expect from a digital Leica rangefinder. I think I am veering towards the M262 with the Voigtlander Ultron35mm. Theres been a couple of times when Ive picked the camera up one after using it in lower light and ended up shooting a whole loads of frames at a high ISO before twigging that the chosen shutter speed seems too high. Unfortunately, my business partner has also vetoed the idea of me selling both M240 and M262 to buy an M10. ), and Im now looking to part with the Leica M240 and put the money back into my business (where I borrowed it from). The beauty of the Leica M262 is what they took away.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_16',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); That being said, even with major Leica models the upgrade path involves such small incremental changes. I am looking to get into the Leica M systemhave been on various of the Leica Fora, discussing the merits of an M9 / M9P. Read full post here: I am primarily a Nikon digital and film shooter, and my quest for minimalism and the fact that I already own a Nikon Z6 mirrorless camera were the major reasons to sell the digital Leica 262. I typically use a 75mm lens on my M 262. Your link has been automatically embedded. I can get focus on a defined distance or subject and with a remote release or the self timer, get stealthy images while at the same time getting real time information on exposure. I cant. With the ISO being menu driven, its also very possible to accidentally leave it on a too-high setting. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. Shooting with the Leica M262 in manual ISO takes 3 commands to change and set the ISO. Of course there will be technological advances and all kinds of new features. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers whats best described as a stripped-back user interface. November 7, 2013 December 8, 2013 Peter . The device is dustproof and water-resistant. A blessing in some ways, though frustratingly its taken the edge off a feature Ive enjoyed more than I expected to. It was mentioned in LFI first issue of 2016. It is the successor to the world's first full-frame mirrorless camera, the LEICA M9 of 2009.. We were shooting inside a large carpet manufacturers in Kidderminster and I was trying to get some slightly abstract well timed shots of the various goings on in the factory. It serves specific duty now, monochrome and infrared imaging only. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. Just because something new release does not mean the M9 or even the M8 lost theirs. Your previous content has been restored. I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come., [] a moment to reflect on this previous style of photography of mine. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Personally Id always choose an M without video capability, but thats personal preference. No fuss, just compose and shoot. There is still some faint banding, but a huge improvement over the M240. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. I wanted an M262 for all the reasons above but found an M-P 240 for a really good price and just turned off all the video and live view. The Leica M240 has done me proud whilst the M262 has been away, though the experience has not be without a couple of surprises, so I thought Id write a little bit about what Ive found.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_9',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); First off, I should probably say that this isnt going to be a proper review Ive written so many reviews about Leica rangefinder cameras and their subtle differences that the idea of writing my thoughts about every facet of this camera just doesnt appeal at all and thats despite this one having more to offer than any that Ive shot before. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Completely agree I really thought thats what they were going to do. Hi everyone. Hello. And if you are not interested in movies or EVF, as a.Noctilux said, you can ignore them. Now, that update costs thousands of dollars. Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. Ah yes, sorry, of course the screen is actually useful! On the Leica M262 the thumb dial can be set to control exposure compensation. The camera is nearly forgotten in the Leica world. what a great text, and great pictures, thank you! This page is currently only available in English. Any help you learned people would be able to give me as to M240 vs M262 and a good lenswould be invaluable and very much appreciated. Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). Thank you for pointing me to that review. Same settings, same ISO of 320, etc. In fact, there was a time when I swore I didnt need anything more. Then I bought an early mirrorless camera possibly a Panasonic or Sony, I cant remember which came first and I had to eat a load of humble pie. They arent rangefinder coupled past 1m, but nonetheless they do focus that close. (Leica M Typ 240), Nikon D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS, Sony a6600 + Sony E 18-135mm F3__5-5__6 OSS, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/3__5-5__6 OSS, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM. 1) Slimmer - The M10 has a slimmer camera body than the M240, similar to the Leica film cameras such as a Leica M6. (Leica M (Typ 262)) CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. The Digital Leica M Samples Gallery (Any digital M from M8 to M-D 262) Below are all images taken with a digital Leica M from the 240 to the m_P to the M-D, the latest and greatest M Rangefinders from Leica Camera. And thats pushing it. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. I wish I did. For example, I have seen an as new M240 from a Leica Store for 2,495 and a Voigtlander Ultron 50mm for c.700. In case youre confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. One is not better or worse than the other, they are just different. Whats the best camera for around $2000? This is a useful feature for me that I enjoyed using the Fuji system which had a great focus peaking aid. Thanks!These new Nikons look fairly amazing I do wish theyd been quicker to market though!M10 review I guess it depends on how much it inspires a post out of me its the first new Leica Digital camera Ive ever bought, and with it being new/current, I might try and squeeze something out sooner rather than later. Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. Has a built-in focus motor Leica M (Typ 262) I guess its only really there as it was the most logical thing for Leica to put there in place of the LV live view button on the M240. After a few weeks of using the new Leica M262 I posted a review along with a few videos. With 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. Its funny, the M262 seems to be the Leica camera that people forget. Thirty days, a new sensor, a new shutter mechanism, and a couple other tweaks and the camera was better than new. Now, Im writing this after my M262 has come back from Germany (it only took a couple of months!! Which is the better buy? This page contains all hands-on, detailed Camera Reviews that have been published at Photography Life. To each his own. Fortunately, whilst the control of ISO isnt quite perfect, I have found the way exposure compensation works on the Leica M262 to be a big step up from the M9. I like them nice and simple, low tech, etc. This made me think; maybe I could get on with the video features too? I think everyone gave great suggestions, I went with a new 262, love the shutter and simplicity compared to the 240. Why torture yourself? More about being to see the settings at a glance, rather than just be able to change them easily. The settings I use (format and manual or auto lens designation) pop up first on the main menu and with 2 clicks both actions are completed. (Leica M (Typ 262)), Unknown. Actually, a large part of this is because they dont often inspire me to write about them whilst I own them, yet I hate to see them go without doing them the justice of sharing a few thoughts.var cid='8222364248';var pid='ca-pub-7054871687658000';var slotId='div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0';var ffid=1;var alS=1002%1000;var container=document.getElementById(slotId);container.style.width='100%';var ins=document.createElement('ins');ins.id=slotId+'-asloaded';ins.className='adsbygoogle ezasloaded';ins.dataset.adClient=pid;ins.dataset.adChannel=cid;if(ffid==2){ins.dataset.fullWidthResponsive='true';}
Accident On Rt 73 Berlin, Nj Today,
Columbia Shuttle Autopsy Photos,
Articles L